Dialers & Voice
R

Readymode

Established predictive dialing platform for outbound call centres, founded in 2014 by a named chief executive and formerly sold as Xencall. Hybrid cloud software with preview, power, progressive and predictive modes, blended inbound and outbound calling, a built in system of record, live floor monitoring with listen, whisper and interject, dynamic scripts, and a premium tier adding caller identity reputation monitoring, assisted remediation of flagged numbers, custom call cadences and an autopilot that dials from the numbers each lead's carrier trusts most.

Sold into consumer facing verticals, real estate, solar, health insurance, home improvement, travel and outsourced call centres, with calling supported into the United States and Canada only. The compliance surface is the deepest in the dialer category: the two governing regimes named with the per violation penalty quantified, do not call list management, automated state calling restrictions covering holidays, emergencies and time windows, consent timeframe settings, scrubbing integrations, a stated position on the autodialer definition with legal reasoning, and a maintained compliance centre tracking state law changes weeks ahead of effective dates.

Entry pricing is self serve at two hundred thirty nine dollars per license monthly with the premium tier at two hundred ninety nine, thirty to seventy five phone numbers included per license, free outbound minutes under an unpublished fair use policy, and inbound at two cents per minute.

Last VerifiedAugust 22, 2026
Compare Readymode with other vendors
Founded
2014
Headquarters
Website
readymode.com
Categories
dialers-and-voice, sales-engagement
Assessment

Capability Axes

AI Capability
AI CentralityAI CentralityWhether AI is the product or a feature veneer. The removal test: peel the AI label off, and does anything sellable remain?
CC on AI CentralityAI features on a conventional platform. Peel the AI label off and the product still works roughly as before.
Vendor Published

The intelligence claims are proportionate to what a dialer is: a predictive algorithm that adjusts dialing speed to agent availability, and an autopilot that selects which of the customer's numbers to dial from using carrier level reputation signals. No generative model feature is marketed anywhere read, and the convention holds that a competent product making a modest claim sits in the middle rather than the bottom. The internal permission for using the dialer is literally named the artificial intelligence dialer permission, which is more branding than the product's marketing itself attempts.

Autonomy and Oversight ModelAutonomy and Oversight ModelWhat the system does without a human. Draft for review, auto send, or fully agentic, and what contains a bad run.
BB on Autonomy and Oversight ModelThe human in the loop posture is described substantively (draft versus auto send, approval flows) but the failure containment story is incomplete.
Vendor Published

The oversight surface is administrative rather than agentic and it is described rather than gestured at, in a public help centre with real granularity. Named permission tiers govern who may use the dialer, who may manage application settings and who may pause themselves out of a queue. Administrators configure lead distribution, do not call rules, consent and opt in timeframes and background dialing speed from documented settings.

Live floor monitoring lets a supervisor listen, whisper or interject on any call in real time, and every call ends in an agent selected disposition with configurable follow up behaviour. A human is on every conversation, so the machine's autonomy is confined to pacing and number selection. Off the top band: no audit log is described, and the autopilot's number selection operates on reputation signals the customer cannot inspect.

AI Disclosure and Model TransparencyAI Disclosure and Model TransparencyWhat models power the product, whether AI generated outreach discloses itself, and whether scoring and routing logic is explainable.
CC on AI Disclosure and Model TransparencyThe product is described as AI powered with the stack, the disclosure behavior, and the scoring logic all unstated.
Vendor Published

The two algorithmic capabilities, predictive pacing and carrier aware number selection, are described at benefit level only. No method, signal set, model or provider is identified for either, and the reputation data feeding the autopilot is attributed to carrier level intelligence without naming a source. There is little model surface to disclose, and what exists is not.

Operational and Outcome EvidenceOperational and Outcome EvidenceMeasured outcomes with a stated basis: replies, meetings, pipeline, win rates. Logos are not evidence and prestige is not measurement.
BB on Operational and Outcome EvidenceReal outcome evidence published, with named customers and numbers, but the measurement basis is incomplete: population, period, or definition unstated.
Vendor Published

Named customers carry quantified results: an outsourcing provider reporting contact rates up five hundred percent, a home services company reporting a four times productivity gain on video, and a named operation reporting lead conversion up thirty percent, all in a maintained success stories library.

Individual reviewers are named with roles, an aggregate rating of four point six across more than a hundred reviews on a major directory is real and checkable, and a review platform derived time to return figure is displayed against an industry average.

Off the top band: the headline four times faster return claim carries no method, and the review statistics band on the site renders its percentage counters as zeros to a fetcher, so the page's own proof numbers are invisible to a machine reader, the session's published versus retrievable pattern again.

Compliance and Risk
Outreach Compliance PostureOutreach Compliance PostureHow the product handles regulated outreach: consent, DNC scrubbing, opt out mechanics, caller ID conduct, and the public enforcement record.
AA on Outreach Compliance PostureCompliance is built into the workflow and documented: consent and DNC scrubbing in product, opt out mechanics enforced, and the vendor addresses TCPA and CAN-SPAM obligations by name, with a clean public enforcement record.
Vendor Published

The second top band on this axis for a voice product, and it meets the template the first one set. The two governing regimes are named, the federal telemarketing statute and the national do not call registry, with the penalty quantified at up to fifteen hundred dollars per violation per call.

The machinery is built in rather than promised: do not call lists that import, export, filter and edit, automated state calling restrictions covering holidays, states of emergency, attempt limits and time windows, consent and opt in timeframe settings inside the dialer, and integrations with compliance vendors for registry scrubbing.

The vendor takes a reasoned public position that its architecture falls outside the automatic dialing system definition because it cannot randomly or sequentially generate numbers, publishes an explainer on the rule, states plainly that legal responsibility remains the customer's and advises consulting an attorney, and maintains a compliance centre tracking state law changes, covering a state statute amendment two months before its effective date. The chief executive's membership in an industry body against consumer harassment is stated. Voicemail drops are conditioned on consent and tracked against limits.

Data Privacy PostureData Privacy PostureGDPR and CCPA posture: lawful basis, data subject rights handling, DPA availability, subprocessor disclosure.
CC on Data Privacy PostureA standard privacy policy exists and answers none of the questions this product category specifically raises.
Vendor Published

A privacy policy and cookie statement exist at their own routes and neither was opened, so this row is flagged. The platform holds consumer lead records across sensitive verticals including health insurance, plus call recordings of consumers, and nothing on the pages read addresses retention of recordings, data subject handling for the people called, or a processing framework for the customer's lead data.

Data Licensing and ProvenanceData Licensing and ProvenanceWhere the data comes from and on what legal footing: licensed, contributed, public record, or scraped, and who stands behind the answer.
CC on Data Licensing and ProvenanceData is described by its size and coverage with its origin unstated. The provenance question is answerable only by asking the vendor.
Vendor Published

The vendor sells no contact data. Leads arrive from the customer by import or by third party lead posting from the customer's own vendors, which keeps provenance risk where it originated. Graded in the middle because the clean position follows from the business model rather than a stated policy, and because the platform serves lead buying verticals where upstream consent quality is the whole compliance question and nothing published addresses how posted leads carry their consent records.

Platform Terms ExposurePlatform Terms ExposureWhether the product operates inside the terms of the platforms it touches, and the restriction risk a buyer inherits when it does not.
BB on Platform Terms ExposureThe method is described and mostly conformant, with one real ambiguity the vendor does not resolve, or conformance asserted without the partnership evidence that would settle it.
Vendor Published

The architecture is the sanctioned one: the vendor operates its own telephony through what it describes as top tier one carriers, provisions phone numbers itself with activation fees waived, and connects to other software through official integrations and a workflow platform. Nothing automates a third party's interface or rents identity.

Off the top band under the standing rule, a stated conformance position is what separates the two upper bands, and while the reputation monitoring and remediation products are conformance adjacent in practice, no carrier or registry conformance commitment is stated as such.

AI Safety and Data StewardshipAI Safety and Data StewardshipThe cross client boundary: whether customer data trains models that serve competitors, plus retention and deletion posture.
CC on AI Safety and Data StewardshipSecurity language exists but the training question, the one this axis turns on, is unanswered: a buyer cannot tell whether their pipeline data improves a competitor’s instance.
Vendor Published

The stewardship questions here are recordings and reputation data rather than model training: calls with consumers are recorded for compliance and quality, and nothing published states retention, access, or whether recordings or dialing outcomes feed the carrier intelligence that serves other customers. The cross client question has a concrete form in the autopilot, which selects numbers using reputation signals aggregated from somewhere, and no page read says from where.

Recipient Disclosure and AuthenticityRecipient Disclosure and AuthenticityHow the product presents itself to the people it targets: whether automated outreach and AI agents disclose themselves, whether sender personas are real, and whether personalization is grounded in verifiable fact. Measured as known compliance with Article 50 of the EU AI Act, in force since August 2, 2026, which requires AI systems that interact with individuals to disclose that fact.
CC on Recipient Disclosure and AuthenticityNothing published on whether recipients are told they are dealing with software. For a product whose AI talks to prospects, silence here is now a regulatory posture, not a style choice.
Vendor Published

The category's settled tension is present in its clearest form. Caller identity proximity matching appears on the feature list and local caller identity matching is a named selling point on the solar vertical page, meaning the number displayed to the person answering is chosen to look local to them, while the reputation products sold beside it exist to keep those numbers trusted by carriers. Thirty to seventy five numbers per license is the inventory that makes the rotation work. Voicemail drops deliver prerecorded messages, conditioned on consent. Nothing published takes a position on what the person called is told about who is calling or why the number looks familiar.

Integration and Deployment
Ecosystem and Integration DepthEcosystem and Integration DepthDocumented depth of CRM and stack integration: objects, sync direction, API surface, marketplace presence that matches the claims.
BB on Ecosystem and Integration DepthSolid primary CRM integration documented, with depth unstated at the edges (sync direction, custom objects, failure behavior).
Vendor Published

Named connectors do identifiable work, a major system of record, two vertical platforms for real estate investment, a low code business platform, plus hundreds of prebuilt connections through the major workflow tool, third party lead posting, compliance vendor integrations for list scrubbing, and a programmatic interface listed among the platform capabilities. A genuinely deep public help centre documents the product at the level of individual settings screens.

Off the top band: no developer documentation or marketplace was located, and the sharpest fact sits on the price card, integrations are entirely absent from the entry tier and unlimited on the premium one, so the connective surface is a paid upgrade, the session's price ladder pattern in its most binary form.

Deployment Model and Data ResidencyDeployment Model and Data ResidencyWhere the product runs and where customer data lives, including residency options for EU buyers.
CC on Deployment Model and Data ResidencyCloud hosted is the whole public answer. Region and residency questions require a sales conversation.
Vendor Published

The one architectural statement is hybrid cloud, repeated as a differentiator, with usability from anywhere and calling restricted to the United States including Hawaii and Canada. No hosting provider, country, region, data centre or residency option is named anywhere read, and no security page exists where such a statement would sit. The calling scope is a real geographic disclosure; where the recordings and lead data rest is not answered.

Security Certifications and Trust CenterSecurity Certifications and Trust CenterVerifiable security posture: enumerated current certifications and a trust center an outsider can actually read.
CC on Security Certifications and Trust CenterSecurity is claimed in general terms. Asserting certifications without enumerating them is weaker than it looks, and this band is where that lands.
Vendor Published

Two real controls are named where a buyer sees them: a firewall that blocks agent logins from unsecured locations, which is a meaningful control for a distributed call centre workforce, and customizable role based access over who may view or manage sensitive data.

Past those, no certification, audit, attestation, report, penetration test, trust centre, status page or vulnerability disclosure route was located on any page read, at a platform holding consumer records in health insurance and financial adjacent verticals plus recordings of every call. The standing formulation applies: asserted controls without independent verification are weaker than they look.

Commercial and Operational
Commercial TransparencyCommercial TransparencyWhether a buyer can budget without a sales call. Published pricing graded on completeness, not on the price itself.
BB on Commercial TransparencyPartial pricing published (entry tiers real, enterprise opaque) or pricing published with load bearing exclusions.
Vendor Published

The published path is unusually complete for a demo led category: both tiers priced per license monthly and annually with the discount stated, self serve purchase for the entry tier with no demonstration required, thirty or seventy five phone numbers included per license with activation fees waived, setup fees waived, inbound minutes priced at two cents, a free administrator license with its limitations explained in the footnote, currency and payment methods stated, and a full feature comparison table.

Off the top band on two load bearing gaps: outbound minutes, the core resource of a dialer, are free subject to a fair use policy that is not published, and voicemail drops incur a cost with no rate anywhere, so the two usage meters most likely to move a heavy caller's bill are the two without numbers. The premium tier also requires a sales conversation despite carrying a published price.

Exit and Data PortabilityExit and Data PortabilityWhat happens when a customer leaves: completeness of data export, rights to enriched or licensed data after termination, deletion commitments, and auto renewal mechanics, graded from published terms and documentation.
CC on Exit and Data PortabilityExport exists as a feature claim while the terms that govern exit, data rights after termination, deletion, and auto renewal mechanics, are not published anywhere a buyer can read.
Vendor Published

The one concrete export path on any page read is the do not call list, which imports and exports as a product feature. For everything else, lead records, dispositions, call history and recordings, no export function, format, post termination right, deletion commitment or retention period appears anywhere, and the terms and conditions were not opened. A platform this age with a built in system of record holding years of a customer's consumer data publishes nothing about how any of it leaves.

Deliverability and Sending DisciplineDeliverability and Sending DisciplineThe operational craft of sending: warmup, rotation, volume governance, spam rate monitoring, and what happens when reputation degrades.
BB on Deliverability and Sending DisciplineReal deliverability features documented, with the operating discipline (limits, monitoring, intervention) asserted rather than specified.
Vendor Published

For a dialer this axis is calling discipline and number reputation, and the apparatus here is the most complete in the category so far: reputation monitoring across the customer's numbers, assisted remediation to recover numbers flagged as spam, an autopilot that dials from the numbers each lead's carrier trusts most, custom cadences with attempt limits, dialing speed that adjusts automatically to agent availability, and voicemail drops tracked against limits.

The tension is structural and worth stating: thirty to seventy five numbers per license is a large rotation inventory, and the same machinery that keeps reputation healthy also distributes calling across enough numbers that no single one accumulates the flags.

Off the top band: the entire reputation apparatus is gated to the premium tier, so the discipline tooling is an upsell, the pattern first recorded when a privacy control was sold as an upgrade, and no abandoned call rate mechanics or pacing thresholds are published.

Segment and Market CoverageSegment and Market CoverageWho the product actually serves, evidenced: segments, geographies, languages, and customers that match the claim.
BB on Segment and Market CoverageSegment focus is clear and evidenced with a gap in geographic or language specifics.
Vendor Published

Six vertical solution pages each carry a distinct pitch, real estate, solar, health and government medical insurance, outsourced call centres, travel and home improvement, and the tier cards state fit plainly, one plus licenses for the entry tier and ideal for five plus on the premium. Geographic coverage is stated with unusual precision for this index: calling into the continental United States including Hawaii and Canada only, priced in United States dollars only, usable from anywhere.

Named customers span the stated verticals and the claim of thousands of businesses sits beside checkable public review counts. Off the top band: no customer count, seat band data or language coverage, and nothing says who the product is wrong for.

Commercial

Pricing

Vendor-published figures are labeled as such. Figures labeled “Estimated” are derived from third-party sources and have not been confirmed by the vendor.

No pricing data has been verified for this vendor. Pricing information will be published here once confirmed through vendor disclosure or third-party estimation.

Contact us

Found a vendor we missed? Have feedback on the index? We’d love to hear from you.

GTM Tech Index

An independent reference for evaluating the software revenue teams use to find, win, and keep customers. No vendor pays for inclusion, placement, or rating.

Index Status
Last index update
August 23, 2026
The GTM Tech Index is an editorial reference, not a law firm or a regulator. Compliance postures are assessed from published sources and public records, and nothing on the index is legal advice. Figures labeled “Estimated” have not been confirmed by the vendor. See the Methodology page for evaluation standards and limitations.
© 2026 GTM Tech Index
3801 N Capital of Texas Hwy, Ste E240 · Austin, TX 78746